Opinion--"a court’s written statement explaining its decision in a given
case, usually including the statement of facts, points of law, rationale, and
dicta.”
-Black’s
Law Dictionary
Ahh so sorry I’ve been absent for so
long! Law school really throws you right
into the swing of things. One week down
and I’ve already read well over a couple hundred pages.
I’m liking all of my classes, each
for their own reasons. Criminal law brings
up a lot of interesting cases, like ones about cannibalism (ewww) but it’s one
of the more traditional areas of law. My
professor is pretty chill and doesn’t really subscribe to the traditional
Socratic method of teaching in law school.
He also teaches undergrads and MBA students so it just doesn’t fit with
his teaching style, but it also makes it a little less intimidating, knowing
there won’t be as much cold calling.
My Torts professor makes the subject really fascinating with her enthusiasm and examples. She’s been at the school a long time and used to be the acting dean so she’s a little intimidating (in an awesome way). However, she really wants us to learn the material and has great ways of trying to do that. As it’s at the heart of most civil proceedings, Civil Procedure is probably the most important of these courses. The subject is a little daunting, just because of the sheer number of rules to know, but my professor has a great way of exploring cases using diagramming. However, he calls on us in alphabetical order so it’s a little nerve-wracking trying to figure out where in the alphabet we are and see how many people we have to go through to get to me.
My Torts professor makes the subject really fascinating with her enthusiasm and examples. She’s been at the school a long time and used to be the acting dean so she’s a little intimidating (in an awesome way). However, she really wants us to learn the material and has great ways of trying to do that. As it’s at the heart of most civil proceedings, Civil Procedure is probably the most important of these courses. The subject is a little daunting, just because of the sheer number of rules to know, but my professor has a great way of exploring cases using diagramming. However, he calls on us in alphabetical order so it’s a little nerve-wracking trying to figure out where in the alphabet we are and see how many people we have to go through to get to me.
My Legal Writing and Research class
is really interesting too. I was never
the best writer in high school or college but there’s something about legal
writing that I really enjoy. Maybe it’s
just because I really enjoy the subject.
For my Research class, my first few assignments were about getting used
to using WestLaw, Lexis Nexis, and Bloomberg Law. One of the awesome things about using WestLaw
was that as I completing my assignments, I was earning points to feed my
Starbucks addiction!
Additionally, I had a lot of extra
required meetings last week. The first
was a session with my TA for Legal Writing and Research about how to use our
Bluebooks and tabbing (I’ll share more about that later). The second was a writing diagnostic test to
see what areas of grammar and punctuation we need to work on. This test doesn’t do anything to my grade, it
was more of a gauge to see what areas I could use a refresher on. It was really similar to the writing section
on the SATs, not really that terrible.
And lastly, I had a meeting with my TA/mentor group for Civil
Procedure. Our class was spilt up into
groups of about 18 and we were paired with an older student who did well in the
class. The first week was designed to go
over our briefs for one of the most difficult cases in Civ Pro, Pennoyer v. Neff (if you’ve read it,
then you’ll understand). The sessions
are held every week and are optional but are designed to go over the
information in a more down to earth way of explanation.
Good luck to everyone in week two
and those of you just starting for the semester!
No comments:
Post a Comment